Current Task

Perform the FINAL editorial review of

AI_DEVELOPMENT_SYSTEM.md

This is the final review before the document becomes the official governance baseline.

The architecture is frozen.

The governance is frozen.

No new concepts may be introduced.

Only consistency, clarity, formatting, numbering, and cross-references may be improved.

---

Purpose

This is the final quality review.

The objective is to make the document internally consistent and publication-ready.

No architectural changes.

No workflow changes.

No governance changes.

Editorial improvements only.

---

Review Scope

Review the ENTIRE document.

Check every section.

Check every heading.

Check every diagram.

Check every cross-reference.

Check every numbered subsection.

Check every table.

Check every code block.

Check every document reference.

Check every terminology usage.

---

Phase 1

Heading Number Consistency

Verify every heading numbering.

Examples:

5
5.1
5.2

6
6.1
6.2

etc.

No duplicated numbering.

No skipped numbering.

No incorrect subsection references.

Correct every numbering inconsistency.

---

Phase 2

Cross References

Verify every internal reference.

Examples:

Section references

AI.md references

WORKFLOW references

DBP references

MIB references

Sprint references

Every cross-reference must point to the correct section after the final numbering.

---

Phase 3

Terminology Consistency

Ensure identical terminology is used throughout.

Examples:

Always use:

Human Approver

Implementation Agent

Documentation Agent

Quality Reviewer

Architecture Lead

Repository

Memory File

Implementation Report

Design Revision Pack

Master Implementation Backlog

Development Blueprint

Avoid using multiple names for the same concept.

Standardize wording everywhere.

---

Phase 4

Diagram Consistency

Review every ASCII diagram.

Ensure:

alignment

spacing

arrow style

box style

flow direction

terminology

All diagrams should follow one visual style.

---

Phase 5

Governance Consistency

Verify there are no contradictory statements regarding:

authority hierarchy

documentation hierarchy

Git permissions

approval workflow

account rotation

quality gates

DRP

memory system

No duplicate rules.

No conflicting wording.

---

Phase 6

Repository Consistency

Verify directory names are identical everywhere.

Examples:

docs/ai/prompts/

docs/ai/memory/

docs/ai/responses/

docs/02-architecture/

docs/04-governance/

No inconsistent paths.

---

Phase 7

Language Polish

Improve only:

grammar

sentence flow

readability

parallel sentence structure

table formatting

Do NOT rewrite entire sections.

Preserve meaning.

---

Phase 8

Publication Review

Read the document once as if you are a new senior engineer joining the project.

Ask:

Can this document explain the entire AI development methodology without requiring additional explanation?

If any explanation is missing,

improve only the explanation.

Do NOT add new governance.

---

Phase 9

Final Verification

Verify:

✓ Architecture unchanged

✓ Governance unchanged

✓ Workflow unchanged

✓ Authority hierarchy unchanged

✓ No new concepts introduced

✓ No sections removed

✓ No implementation rules changed

✓ Version remains

Version 1.0 (Final)

---

Output

Provide:

1. Editorial improvements made

2. Numbering corrections

3. Cross-reference corrections

4. Formatting improvements

5. Grammar improvements

6. Governance changes

Expected:

None

7. Architecture changes

Expected:

None

8. Final Recommendation

Expected:

AI_DEVELOPMENT_SYSTEM.md

Status:

FINAL

Governance Baseline Approved

Ready for Sprint 1

Do not create any additional documents.

Do not create a Design Revision Pack.

Do not increment the version.

This review is editorial only.